Official Positions Education Fund Releases Major Research Report: Improving Academic Outcomes in NCAA Division I Revenue Sports and HBCU Limited Resource Athletic ProgramsThe Drake Group Letter to U.S. Dept. of Education/Office for Civil Rights — Request for Issuance of Title IX Guidance Addressing Recruiting Practices of NIL Booster Collectives NILs and Title IX: Educational Institutions Must Fix their Promotion, Publicity, and Recruiting Inequities Critical to the NIL Monetization Success of College Female Athletes and Must Not Use Third Parties to Evade Their Title IX Obligations A Continuing Disgrace: Intercollegiate Athletics Race Issues The U.S. House NIL Bill, Student Athlete Level Playing Field Act, Is Improved but Still Needs Further Specification Moran Legislation is Another NCAA Reform Proposal that Deserves a Closer Look The Drake Group Strongly Supports “College Athletes Bill of Rights” Introduced in the 117th Congress Collegiate Athlete Compensation Rights Act Misses Mark on What is Needed to Protect the Independent Publicity Rights of College Athletes The Drake Group Applauds “Intentional Discrimination” Lawsuit Alleging NCAA Discriminates Against HBCUs Failing to Confront the “Elephants in the Room” – The Drake Group Comments on the Knight Commission Proposal to Transform the NCAA D-I Model NCAA and NAIA Give It the “Old College Try” with NIL Proposals, but Do Not Go Far Enough State-by-State Legislation on College Athlete Name/Image/Likeness – A Drake Database Drake Group Calls for Congress to Enact College Athlete Protections: A Legislative Proposal The Drake Group Raises Concerns Regarding July 22 U.S. Senate Judiciary Hearing Testimony on College Athlete NILs/Compensation The Drake Group Raises Concerns Regarding July 1, 2020 U.S. Senate Commerce Committee Hearing on College Athlete NILs Compensation College Athletes Should Give U.S. Senate NIL Bill a Failing Grade: Criticism of the Fairness in Collegiate Athletics Act Criticism of April 29, 2020, NCAA Board of Governors’ Guidelines for Future NCAA and Federal NIL Legislation Critical Analysis of Proposed Models of College Athlete Compensation Compensation of College Athletes Including Revenues Earned from Commercial Use of Their Names, Images and Likenesses and Outside Employment College Athlete Health and Protection from Physical and Psychological Harm College Presidents Choose to Enable Academic Fraud in Athletics College Athlete Codes of Conduct and Issues Related to Freedom of Speech and Expression Rights of College Athletes Athletic Governance Organization and Institutional Responsibilities Related to Professional Coaching Conduct Need for National Collegiate Athletic Governance Organization Rules Related to Athlete Sexual Misconduct and Other Physical Violence Excessive Athletics Time Demands Undermine College Athletes’ Health and Education and Require Immediate Reform Fixing the Dysfunctional NCAA Enforcement System Guidelines for Academic Integrity in Athletics Why the NCAA Academic Progress Rate (APR) and the Graduation Success Rate (GSR) should be Abandoned and Replaced with More Effective Academic Metrics Student Fee and Institutional Subsidy Allocations to Fund Intercollegiate Athletics The Drake Group Calls Upon NCAA, Its Member Institutions And Higher Education Regional Accreditation Agencies To Fulfill Athlete Academic Protection Responsibilities Freshmen Ineligibility in Intercollegiate Athletics Congress Granting a Conditional Limited Antitrust Exemption to the NCAA and Its Member Institutions The Drake Group Response to Declaration of James E. Delany in Support of the NCAA’s Class Certification Opposition Brief Establishment of a Congressional Commission on Intercollegiate Athletics Reform Drake Group Questions NCAA Division I Governance Restructure
